Did you read The Wall Street Journal and see this on page D5 in Sports on November 3? Take a moment to click on the photo to see it better. In the print edition there was a column about a new book on the upper right hand side and an ad for the book on the bottom.
First, I found it strange to read an entire column by sports columnist Jason Gay touting his new book, “Little Victories: Perfect Rules for Imperfect Living” and secondly, it’s odd to see an ad for the book on the same page.
Seriously WSJ? A journalist was given carte blanche to use his column to promote his new book plus display an ad for it on the same page. Was he given a pass since he covers sports and not breaking news or business? I have no idea but think it’s a conflict of interest for a journalist and a news outlet the size and stature of The Wall Street Journal.
His column “The Best Victories Are the Little Ones” was laced with sarcasm and wit, so it was as usual a fun read. For example, citing his mother’s feelings about his new book he writes, “My mother has proclaimed it to be “Not bad.” In describing his new book he writes, “It’s a life guide for people who hate life guides” and “I want it to make you laugh – a lot.”
I enjoy Jason’s columns as they are usually light-hearted fare for this subscriber who is not well-versed in the world of big-time sports or knows a thing about fantasy football.
I get it. The lines between editorial and advertising are blurring with native advertising, brand journalism, branded content, sponsored content and paid posts all becoming more popular. Even Blurrier Lines on NPR’s On The Media show explores this trend.
Unfortunately we read about cuts everyday at news organizations grappling with how to stay profitable, figure things out and grow their audiences in the digital age. However the WSJ is not your neighborhood weekly where highly promotional pieces may appear that are sold as part of an editorial/advertising package.
Your thoughts? I’d love to know.